JDevlieghere added a comment. In D65566#1612051 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65566#1612051>, @sgraenitz wrote:
> In D65566#1611007 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65566#1611007>, @JDevlieghere > wrote: > > > Is there a way to use the debugserver in the framework instead? > > > This patch is about the debugserver in the framework. It must be signed, > because the lldb driver uses it implicitly and, apparently, that is the > correct behavior. > debugserver is built as `bin/debugserver` and copied to > `bin/LLDB.framework/Resources/debugserver` (the latter is currently not > signed in Xcode builds). Ok, thanks, I misunderstood and thought it was the other way around. >> This seems like the inverse of the problem we had earlier with the RPATHs, >> where we would fix them up in the build tree after copying them. > > It's purely about the functionality of the build-tree lldb. > > BTW The problem you may refer to (--> > https://reviews.llvm.org/D61952#change-2C1slKxbErMH ?) is unrelated, but it's > still existing when installing with the framework. Currently it doesn't show > up upstream, because in practice configuration-order defines install-order. > So, we are good as long as tools that go into the framework are configured > after the framework. Yep, that's the thing I had in mind. Anyway, what I was trying to express is that this change feels ad-hoc and I'm wondering if we can tackle it more structurally. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65566/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65566 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
