labath added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/source/API/SBFile.cpp:20-26 +void SBFile::SetStream(FILE *file, bool transfer_ownership) { + m_opaque_up = std::make_unique<File>(file, transfer_ownership); +} + +void SBFile::SetDescriptor(int fd, bool transfer_owndership) { + m_opaque_up = std::make_unique<File>(fd, transfer_owndership); +} ---------------- lawrence_danna wrote: > labath wrote: > > I think it would be better if these were constructors instead of member > > functions. That way you might be able to get rid of the all the `if > > (!m_opaque_up) {` checks as the File member will always be initialized. > Unfortunately, SWIG does not allow return types that don't have default > constructors. > > https://github.com/swig/swig/issues/1062 Hmm.. that is unfortunate. I guess that means we still need the validity checks, but you should still be able to replace these with constructors, right? (you've guessed by now that I am not a fan of `Set` methods :) ). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67793/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67793 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits