mstorsjo added a comment. In D68134#1686970 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68134#1686970>, @thakis wrote:
> We can add flags for omitting access specifiers etc if it's critical for > lldb. Or maybe we can just change the test that caused the revert. Yeah I doubt it's critical to maintain the exact same form as before, but I need to get the tests running in my cross compile setup to verify exactly how to update them. Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68134/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68134 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
