vsk added a comment. In D68422#1694147 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68422#1694147>, @labath wrote:
> Looks good to me. Thanks for doing this. Personally, I'd just remove the > `Log` argument from the function argument list, and let the function re-fetch > it if needed. I know we sometimes pass around a `Log*` variable, but most of > the time we don't... That's a good idea. I'll post an updated patch -- as it's relatively minor, I'll land it Monday afternoon (PST) or so if I don't see any objections. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68422/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68422 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
