labath added a comment.

In D67793#1713981 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67793#1713981>, @lawrence_danna 
wrote:

> In D67793#1692544 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67793#1692544>, @labath wrote:
>
> > BTW, I've had to add (or rather, extend) a fairly ugly hack in r373573 in 
> > order to get the new tests running on non-darwin platforms. The reason for 
> > that is that the FILE* out typemap needs to get the "mode" of the object in 
> > order to construct the python wrapper.
> >
> > My hope is that we can be improved once you're finished your work here. For 
> > instance by reimplementing `GetOutputFileHandle` on top of `GetOutputFile` 
> > in swig, as the latter will (hopefully) be able to get the mode of a file 
> > correctly. Does that sound reasonable, or am I totally off-track here?
>
>
> oops, sorry I missed this.   Are you happy with how it all turned out?


Yes, very much. Thank you for cleaning that up.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D67793/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D67793



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to