labath added a comment. In principle, this looks pretty similar to D67942 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67942>, and my opinion on it is the same -- I don't think we should be in the business of trying to package the transitive set of lldb dependencies. I think the lldb install target should install the stuff that it has built itself, and the rest should be up to some higher level packaging system.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69931/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69931 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
