Author: Adrian Prantl Date: 2019-12-11T13:30:05-08:00 New Revision: 0ca0fba94d48959a8c5d1e074c8242e46b263d59
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ca0fba94d48959a8c5d1e074c8242e46b263d59 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ca0fba94d48959a8c5d1e074c8242e46b263d59.diff LOG: Add resurrecting Type Validators to projects.rst Added: Modified: lldb/docs/status/projects.rst Removed: ################################################################################ diff --git a/lldb/docs/status/projects.rst b/lldb/docs/status/projects.rst index 703a3c67d68a..48081da59578 100644 --- a/lldb/docs/status/projects.rst +++ b/lldb/docs/status/projects.rst @@ -408,3 +408,12 @@ a sketch of this in the settings parsing code) was to be able to say: (lldb) settings set target{arch=x86_64}.process.thread{name=foo}... The exact details are still to be worked out, however. + +Resurrect Type Validators +------------------------- + +This half-implemented feature was removed in +https://reviews.llvm.org/D71310 but the general idea might still be +useful: Type Validators look at a ValueObject, and make sure that +there is nothing semantically wrong with the object's contents to +easily catch corrupted data. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
