teemperor added a comment. In D81001#2068925 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81001#2068925>, @labath wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation Raphael. This makes more sense now, though I am > still not very clear on the distinction between "completions" and > "suggestions". The fish tutorial mentions command history -- that's something > that's not typically done as a part of tab completion (though maybe it could > be?). However, the rest -- file paths and command arguments -- that's clearly > in scope for tab completion too and our tab handlers already do that. So, the > idea of having "lightweight" completions which would also get run as a part > of "suggestions" does not seem completely off track. Unless I am completely > off track, that is... It's more like a smarter and more user-friendly Ctrl+R search. Having it do something similar to tab completion is a stretch goal at the end. But at the moment the plan is to do just history based suggestions, then see if history + context is possible (i.e., make the suggestions paired to a specific target that you only get a suggestion for `b ASTContext.cpp:434` if you debug LLDB but not if you debug another random program) and then the lightweight completions if there is time left. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81001/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81001 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
