JDevlieghere planned changes to this revision. JDevlieghere marked 3 inline comments as done. JDevlieghere added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectScript.cpp:50-51 + + std::tie(head, tail) = tail.split(' '); + if (head != "-l" && head != "--language") + return CommandParsed(command); ---------------- kastiglione wrote: > generally, lldb supports more than space delimited flags. For example I > often type `expr -lobjc -- ...` with no space. A quick check shows > `--language=objc` is also supported. Should these cases be handled too? Yes, if that works for other command it should work for this command too. I was already on the fence about this, but supporting that would definitely tip the scales beyond the complexity I'm willing to accept to work around the limitations of `CommandObjectParsed`. I'll need to come up with a different solution. ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectScript.cpp:65 + + return CommandParsed(command); +} ---------------- kastiglione wrote: > this is missing error handling for unsupported languages, such as `script -l > swift` I actually did that on purpose, I don't think either Python or Lua support statements that begin with `-l` or `--language` but I didn't want to intercept this unless it meant something to LLDB. But I agree that's not great UX. ================ Comment at: lldb/test/Shell/ScriptInterpreter/Lua/lua-python.test:7 +# RUN: cd %t +# RUN: echo "int main() { return 0; }" | %clang_host -x c - -o a.out +# RUN: cat %s | %lldb 2>&1 | FileCheck %s ---------------- kastiglione wrote: > is `a.out` not a universal default? Not sure about Windows, but regardless I prefer to be explicit. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86996/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86996 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits