teemperor added a comment. In D91003#2380921 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91003#2380921>, @mgorny wrote:
> In D91003#2380907 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91003#2380907>, @teemperor wrote: > >> Given that these are all Objective-C tests, this LGTM. >> >> (Out of scope for this patch, but it would probably be cleaner if we replace >> all the skipUnlessDarwin uses because of Obj-C with a dedicated decorator. >> In theory Obj-C is available on other systems). > > I was kinda wondering why it is done like this, I've presumed some > ObjC-specific parts of LLDB work only on Darwin. I assume that's indeed the case given how much LLDB assumes about the implementation details of the Obj-C runtime. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D91003/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D91003 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
