wallace added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lldb/test/API/functionalities/exec/TestExec.py:91-93
+        # Single step to create a thread plan. We have to make sure that after 
exec
+        # we clear all existing thread plans.
+        thread.StepInstruction(False)
----------------
labath wrote:
> A separate test case would be better, as (even with the comment) a random 
> future modification of the test could negate this.
Sure! I'll wait for @jingham to chime first


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D93874/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D93874

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to