labath added a comment. In D96778#2576881 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96778#2576881>, @dblaikie wrote:
> In D96778#2573076 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96778#2573076>, @jankratochvil > wrote: > >> In D96778#2572816 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96778#2572816>, @dblaikie wrote: >> >>> rolls this into one file with two CUs - bit easier to deal with. >> >> Then one could not use the `.file` directives and one would need to code >> also `.debug_line` by hand. > > Ah, right, makes sense. Not keeping up with the entire debate, just chiming in to say that sometimes one can good results through conditional compilation (`.ifdef` and friends) -- put the common stuff (abbreviations or whatever) in an unconditional block, and the different things into conditional blocks... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D96778/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D96778 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
