clayborg added a comment. In D97739#2636343 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97739#2636343>, @jingham wrote:
> Thanks for doing this! The event version looks pretty clean to me. I think > we should go that way. I don't think we should have two ways, that seems > confusing and still leaves us calling unknown user code in the middle of > symbol updates... Sounds good, just wanted to make sure this was the way we want to go. I will remove the callback stuff. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D97739/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D97739 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
