aganea added a comment. In D99426#2666141 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99426#2666141>, @abhina.sreeskantharajan wrote:
> In D99426#2665361 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99426#2665361>, @aganea wrote: > >> I am still concerned by the fact that this patch doesn't fix the issue >> mentionned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96363#2650460 >> Was the intention to fix that issue? Will the fix be done in a subsequent >> patch? > > I was fairly confident that if https://reviews.llvm.org/D96363 was the patch > that was causing the issue for you That is the case! I've confirmed that `git checkout fdb640ea30d416368b76b68b106deda580c6aced~1 && ninja clang -C build` generates a `clang-cl.exe` that works with my above test case. `git revert fdb640ea30d416368b76b68b106deda580c6aced` locally over ToT fixes the issue. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99426/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99426 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
