DavidSpickett added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/Breakpad/unwind-via-raSearch.test:45
# CHECK: frame #2: 0x000b1085 unwind-via-stack-win.exe`main + 5
# CHECK: frame #3: 0x77278494 kernel32.dll
# CHECK-NOT: frame
----------------
Same thing happens here if you don't have x86 enabled, this last frame is
missing.
================
Comment at:
lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/Breakpad/unwind-via-stack-win-no-memory-info.yaml:13
# CHECK: frame #2: 0x000b1085 unwind-via-stack-win-no-memory-info.exe`main + 5
# CHECK: frame #3: 0x77278494 kernel32.dll
# CHECK-NOT: frame
----------------
@labath In this case, without the x86 backend we do get the first 3 frames just
not the kernel32.dll frame.
```
(lldb) target symbols add
../llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/Breakpad/Inputs/unwind-via-raSearch.syms
symbol file
'/home/david.spickett/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/Breakpad/Inputs/unwind-via-raSearch.syms'
has been added to '/home/david.spickett/build-llvm-aarch64/foo/foo.exe'
(lldb) thread backtrace
* thread #1
* frame #0: 0x000b1092 foo.exe`many_pointer_args + 2
frame #1: 0x000b1079 foo.exe`call_many + 105
frame #2: 0x000b1085 foo.exe`main +
```
So my guess is that the last frame requires x86 specific knowledge to work out.
If you think that's not the case or would prefer I investigate first I can
remove it from this patch.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100194/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100194
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
