mgorny added a comment. In D98822#2685246 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98822#2685246>, @labath wrote:
> I've reverted this (121cff78a8032a73aa4fb820625dc1ecae8e3997 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG121cff78a8032a73aa4fb820625dc1ecae8e3997>) > because it made the linux bot super-flaky. I think it's likely that this > affects _only_ linux (and the BSD code is fine -- though we don't have a bot > to verify that), but I didn't want to experiment with partial reverts while > the bots are wonky. However, it may be interesting the re-land the linux > support in a separate commit, once we figure out the problem -- my money is > on the nondeterminism of thread creation. How about recommitting without the `clone()` change, i.e. assuming that `clone` always means thread, and seeing if that causes trouble still? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D98822/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98822 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
