omjavaid added a comment. it look good to me but I have some final minor nits inline.
================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeProcessLinux.cpp:1458 + + struct iovec tags_vec; + uint8_t *dest = &tags[0]; ---------------- may be rename to tags_iovec? because reading code below i had the tags vector in mind and confused it for that vector which was passed as parameter to this function. ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeProcessLinux.cpp:1459 + struct iovec tags_vec; + uint8_t *dest = &tags[0]; + lldb::addr_t read_addr = range.GetRangeBase(); ---------------- may be use tags.data() ? ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeProcessLinux.cpp:1464 + // get all tags back. + while (num_tags > 0) { + tags_vec.iov_base = dest; ---------------- this loop condition is is a little fishy. num_tags is unsigned which means if by chance it doesnt end up going to zero we ll keep looping for ever. ================ Comment at: lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/memory-tagging/main.c:53 + // smoke test in case something didn't account for them. + buf = (char *)((size_t)buf | ((size_t)0xAA << 56)); + return print_result(buf); ---------------- Just a side question about TBI, for memroy reads/write or tags/query is it necessary to send non address bits to remote? (tags and pauth masks). Can we instead clear these bits before sending address over using the code/data masks we have calculated in our host process class. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D95601/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D95601 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits