teemperor added a comment. +1 to not add any language-specific terms to the Language API.
Looking over the code, it seems what the code is doing its: - Going over the symbol names. - Creating a search index from the symbol names that is optionally grouped via the `FunctionNameType` cases (and there is a 'eFunctionNameTypeSelector' which isn't that nice but that's why we try to do selector-specific stuff). So what about having an API that for a given symbol name gives us all the alternative names we should put into this search index (and optionally a `FunctionNameType` so we can put it into the right group)? I guess C++ could also benefit from the same API as it would just return the right basenames then? If we make the different `m_*to_index` maps in Symtab into something two nested maps with the form `FunctionNameType -> name -> index`, then that would also remove quite a bit of copy-pasted code in Symtab.cpp Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103210/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103210 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
