DavidSpickett added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp:5854
+  if (auto abi = GetABI()) {
+    // TODO: can we always assume data addresses here?
+    load_addr = abi->FixDataAddress(load_addr);
----------------
omjavaid wrote:
> Yes this is ok for now as both Data and Code masks are same in case of Linux. 
> If anything changes in future we ll take care of that at that time. 
Cool. I was also thinking that if they were different you could just apply both 
masks. Since the virtual address size will be the same for either type of 
pointer.

I'll remove this comment.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D102757/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D102757

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to