wallace added a comment.

Pretty good. Just some minor nits. Once you rebase on top of the trace exporter 
plugin patch, this should be good to go.



================
Comment at: lldb/test/API/commands/trace/TestTraceExport.py:54-56
+        TODO: Once the "trace save" command is implemented, gather Intel PT 
+        trace of this program and load it like the other tests instead of 
+        manually executing the commands to trace the program.
----------------
delete this. You can actually compile a main.cpp file as part of the test and 
trace it with intel pt, and then check its output. You don't need "trace save" 
to do that.


================
Comment at: lldb/test/API/commands/trace/intelpt-trace/functions_example.cpp:1
+void log_request_response(int reqest_response) {
+  // logging logic
----------------
rename this file to export_htr_input.cpp or something like that. Same for the 
a.out


================
Comment at: lldb/test/API/commands/trace/intelpt-trace/functions_example.cpp:26
+}
+
+int main() {
----------------
given that we are going to add a binary and we don't want to do it often, add 
another function like

  void iterative_handle_request_by_id(int id, int reps) {
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      if (i % 2 == 0)
        slow_handle_request(id);
      else
        fast_handle_request(id);
  }

just to have someone interesting to test later. Then recompile your a.out


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D105741/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D105741

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to