labath added a comment. In D112163#3077124 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112163#3077124>, @dblaikie wrote:
> In D112163#3077112 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112163#3077112>, @teemperor > wrote: > >> LGTM, thanks! >> >> Tests with libc++ as a category are not run on Windows or when GCC is the >> test compiler, so those decorators are redundant. Removing the Clang XFAIL >> also seems fine, I would just see if any matrix bot complains and then >> re-apply it with a proper minimum required version. > > "matrix bot"? One of the buildbots/group of them? It's a single bot that runs the test suite against a variety of compilers (well, only various versions of clang, I think)... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112163/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112163 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
