teemperor added a comment. > Are you asking for dedicated physical resources for running nightly builds?
I don't think any of the current bots have a Java installation so I think it's either that or we get someone with a bot to setup the required Java installation. FWIW, if no one wants to host a bot for this then I won't mind testing this in own CI <https://ci.teemperor.de>, but I am not using buildbot so we'll have to see if that is acceptable for the community (I could also migrate it to buildbot, but the buildbot interface is just painful to use and I would prefer not to). > Do you really have a separate build machines for the Python and Lua scripting > environments? Python is more or less mandatory so all LLDB build bots have that. Lua is tested here: https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/ On a more general note: I haven't followed this thread very closely, but I am surprised that this is now adding a Java REPL to LLDB. I think the original "Just add Java bindings" seemed like a reasonable patch but I am not so sure about this. Could we split out the changes for just adding Java bindings to SWIG (which anyway seems like a standalone patch) and then we can talk about the whole Java scripting stuff in a separate review. I don't expect the first one to be controversial so this should also speed things up a bit. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D111409/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D111409 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
