werat marked 2 inline comments as done. werat added a comment. In D113498#3137196 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113498#3137196>, @teemperor wrote:
> Not sure how flexible your fuzzer setup is regarding downstream patches, but > did you try putting some kind of `assert("coverage" && false);` in that new > code and try fuzzing until you reach it? It's not that flexible, it runs against the prebuilt version of LLVM 12 at the moment -- https://github.com/google/lldb-eval/releases/tag/oss-fuzz-ubuntu-20.04 > FWIW, I'm OOO for an undefined amount of time so I am not sure when I can > take a look at this again. Feel free to ping in case you don't find another > reviewer. Sure, I'll try to find someone else for now. Will ping if nobody comes along :) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D113498/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D113498 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits