werat marked 2 inline comments as done.
werat added a comment.

In D113498#3137196 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113498#3137196>, @teemperor wrote:

> Not sure how flexible your fuzzer setup is regarding downstream patches, but 
> did you try putting some kind of `assert("coverage" && false);` in that new 
> code and try fuzzing until you reach it?

It's not that flexible, it runs against the prebuilt version of LLVM 12 at the 
moment -- https://github.com/google/lldb-eval/releases/tag/oss-fuzz-ubuntu-20.04

> FWIW, I'm OOO for an undefined amount of time so I am not sure when I can 
> take a look at this again. Feel free to ping in case you don't find another 
> reviewer.

Sure, I'll try to find someone else for now. Will ping if nobody comes along :)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D113498/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D113498

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to