jingham added a comment. In D117928#3262708 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117928#3262708>, @ljmf00 wrote:
> In D117928#3262689 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117928#3262689>, @jingham wrote: > >> In D117928#3262656 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117928#3262656>, @JDevlieghere >> wrote: >> >>> Why are we disabling a lldb test because of a bug in GDB? >> >> Maybe somebody is running the lldb testsuite with gdbserver? That seems a >> legit thing to do, but if so, we should make an xfail category for gdbserver >> and xfail with that. > > I haven't considered that. Shouldn't the testsuite run with lldb-server > anyway? I think so, but how can I confirm that for you? I guess we're just all confused that you are mentioning GDB at all, and the only thing I could think of is gdbserver, since that's the only way anything GDB could get mixed with anything LLDB... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D117928/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D117928 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
