MaskRay added a comment.

In D124673#3512190 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124673#3512190>, @phosek wrote:

> In D124673#3512070 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124673#3512070>, @MaskRay wrote:
>
>> In D124673#3512037 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124673#3512037>, @paulkirth 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Sorry for the late notification, but I think this change may not apply 
>>> correctly to all configs.
>>>
>>> We're seeing a breakage in Fuchsia's Clang CI builders: 
>>> https://luci-milo.appspot.com/ui/p/fuchsia/builders/toolchain.ci/clang-linux-x64/b8814329895908917697/overview
>>>
>>>   FAILED: lib/LineEditor/CMakeFiles/LLVMLineEditor.dir/LineEditor.cpp.o 
>>>   /b/s/w/ir/cache/goma/client/gomacc /b/s/w/ir/x/w/cipd/bin/clang++ 
>>> --sysroot=/b/s/w/ir/x/w/cipd/linux -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG 
>>> -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS 
>>> -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/b/s/w/ir/x/w/staging/llvm_build/lib/LineEditor 
>>> -I/b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm-llvm-project/llvm/lib/LineEditor 
>>> -I/b/s/w/ir/cache/vpython/79db7c/lib/python3.8/site-packages/tensorflow/include
>>>  -I/b/s/w/ir/x/w/staging/llvm_build/include 
>>> -I/b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm-llvm-project/llvm/include -isystem 
>>> /b/s/w/ir/x/w/staging/zlib_install/include -stdlib=libc++ -fPIC 
>>> -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time 
>>> -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter 
>>> -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic 
>>> -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi -Wimplicit-fallthrough 
>>> -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor 
>>> -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wno-comment 
>>> -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -fdiagnostics-color 
>>> -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections 
>>> -ffile-prefix-map=/b/s/w/ir/x/w/staging/llvm_build=../staging/llvm_build 
>>> -ffile-prefix-map=/b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm-llvm-project/= -no-canonical-prefixes 
>>> -O3 -DNDEBUG  -fno-exceptions -fno-unwind-tables 
>>> -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-rtti -UNDEBUG -std=c++14 -MD -MT 
>>> lib/LineEditor/CMakeFiles/LLVMLineEditor.dir/LineEditor.cpp.o -MF 
>>> lib/LineEditor/CMakeFiles/LLVMLineEditor.dir/LineEditor.cpp.o.d -o 
>>> lib/LineEditor/CMakeFiles/LLVMLineEditor.dir/LineEditor.cpp.o -c 
>>> /b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm-llvm-project/llvm/lib/LineEditor/LineEditor.cpp
>>>   /b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm-llvm-project/llvm/lib/LineEditor/LineEditor.cpp:18:10: 
>>> fatal error: 'histedit.h' file not found
>>>   #include <histedit.h>
>>>            ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> since the error is a missing header for `histedit.h`, and this change 
>>> alters how libedit is found in CMake, I assume this is the root cause.
>>>
>>> I'm guessing some part of the old CMake checks like the old 
>>> `HAVE_HISTEDIT_H` may not have propagated correctly in all cases?
>>>
>>> If this will be hard to fix, would you mind reverting until a fix is ready?
>>
>> It's not clear to me that this patch caused the issue for you, so I don't 
>> think it is right to ask for a revert now. You need to provide more evidence.
>> lldb-x86_64-debian and lldb-cmake-standalone on 
>> https://lldb.llvm.org/resources/bots.html work well with the change.
>
> I looked a bit more into the error. In the CMake log I see the following:
>
>   -- Found LibEdit: /usr/include (found version ".") 
>
> This is incorrect because in our build we set 
> `CMAKE_SYSROOT=/b/s/w/ir/x/w/cipd/linux` so CMake shouldn't be looking in 
> paths like `/usr/include` because at build time, Clang will be invoked with 
> `--sysroot=/b/s/w/ir/x/w/cipd/linux` and it won't consider include paths like 
> `/usr/include`.
>
> I don't think this issue was introduced in this change, it's a pre-existing 
> issue with the `FindLibEdit.cmake` module, but it was uncovered by this 
> change.

If the patch exposes a preexisting lurking bug, reverting it temporarily is 
fine if that helps you.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D124673/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D124673

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to