labath accepted this revision. labath added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In D129166#3636658 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129166#3636658>, @dblaikie wrote: >> The overall logic and the include and library paths make sense to me. The >> rpath thingy will not work on windows as it (afaik) has no equivalent >> feature (it has the equivalent of (DY)LD_LIBRARY_PATH though). > > Any idea what the libc++ tests do on Windows then? (on linux they seem to use > rpath to ensure the tests load the just-built libc++) I believe the libc++ tests don't run at all on windows. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D129166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D129166 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
