thieta added a comment. In D130689#3684330 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130689#3684330>, @mehdi_amini wrote:
> What does it mean exactly? We can't use **anything** C++17 without writing it > in the coding standards? > I'm not sure it'll be manageable: how do you see this playing out? Probably poorly worded - what I was trying to convey is that if we want to use a C++17 feature that's really impactful on the syntax/readability we should probably consider recommending ways to use it in the coding standards, similar to our guidelines on using for() loops (https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#use-range-based-for-loops-wherever-possible) or the auto keyword (https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#use-auto-type-deduction-to-make-code-more-readable). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D130689/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D130689 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
