labath added a comment. In D131160#3701839 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131160#3701839>, @mgorny wrote:
> To be honest, I'm not sure if "event" is the best name for it. I get it's a > WSA name but it's a bit non-obvious to outsiders (I mean, technically > everything is an event). Not that I have a better name in mind. Yeah, I know... I checked the thesaurus for "event", and I didn't find anything reasonable. And "signal" is obviously a bad idea.. Another possibility (one that just occurred to me right now) would be to use a completely different paradigm to achieve the effect. For example, we could extend the `PendingCallback` mechanism to enable adding callbacks from different threads (and have them wake the loop if necessary). That would be a more generic mechanism, and it would avoid the need to introduce a new concept (and having to name it). In D131160#3701907 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131160#3701907>, @mgorny wrote: > BTW do you need me to implement the POSIX counterpart to this? That would be appreciated, but I think we first need to figure out the API, and how this code is going to be structured (I'm going to try handling the second part now)... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D131160/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D131160 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
