labath added a comment.

In D131328#3706749 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131328#3706749>, @JDevlieghere 
wrote:

> There was another approach I considered initially which might alleviate some 
> of the issues Pavel raised. Instead of using the global thread pool, that 
> plan consisted of a dedicated thread to fetch symbols in the background. That 
> would allow us to add the symbol info synchronously. For example on every 
> stop we could ask if there are any new symbol files to add instead of trying 
> to add the symbol info as soon as it becomes available.

I kinda like that. Bonus points if you make that single thread download 
multiple files at the same time (using threads to paralelize downloading is not 
the best approach, since the task is not cpu-bound). :)


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D131328/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D131328

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to