aaron.ballman added a comment. In D134878#3869947 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134878#3869947>, @mehdi_amini wrote:
> From what I saw when you posted the discourse thread initially, I understand > you're targeting user-visible features, and mostly from the "toolchain" side > of the project. > However I find the language here to be potentially confusing for the API > surface of the libraries: that is how much of this applies to the LLVM C++ > libraries API surface? > If this is out-of-scope, can this be called out more explicitly? Sure! Would it help to add a paragraph before the bulleted list in `breaking` that says something along the lines of: The C++ interfaces of individual library components of projects like LLVM or Clang are not intended to be stable interfaces. Potentially disruptive changes to such C++ interfaces do not constitute a breaking change unless the disruption is exposed via another mechanism such as a stable C API. (Feel free to wordsmith it!) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134878/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134878 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
