Given the broad impact of this in our code I'm inclined to revert the patch to unblock us. The test case I have so far is still too large, but I hope to get something shareable tomorrow.
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, 04:03 Matheus Izvekov via Phabricator, < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: > mizvekov added a comment. > > @alexfh Thanks! > > While there is a huge increase in the amount of UsingTypes, it seems the > total amount is still reasonable and does not explain the perf hit. > > Perhaps this is a case of bad hashing and they are all falling into the > same bucket? > > cc @sam.mcall for awareness of UsingType issue. > It may be some very simple problem, I just can't even look at the code > right now. > > > Repository: > rG LLVM Github Monorepo > > CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION > https://reviews.llvm.org/D136565/new/ > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D136565 > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
