Ericson2314 marked an inline comment as done.
Ericson2314 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/CMakeLists.txt:100
set(LLVM_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_INTDIR ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/${CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR}/bin)
- set(LLVM_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_INTDIR
${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/${CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR}/lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX})
+ set(LLVM_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_INTDIR ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/${CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR}/lib)
if(WIN32 OR CYGWIN)
----------------
sebastian-ne wrote:
> Ericson2314 wrote:
> > sebastian-ne wrote:
> > > Just to check if your intention aligns with my understanding, removing
> > > the suffix here is fine because the destination is in the binary dir and
> > > not the final install destination?
> > Yes exactly.
> >
> > I really should write up the "rules" that I've (a) discovered from reading
> > (b) invented somewhere. Any idea where?
> I think the commit message is a good place.
Mmm, my philosophy is that commit messages should document relationships
between the code, but the code in isolation should be documented in-tree.
I wouldn't want one to have to `git log` to find this information which should
be a "living reference" of the current CMake idioms as currently practiced,
make sense?
================
Comment at: llvm/CMakeLists.txt:59-60
+if (NOT DEFINED CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR AND DEFINED LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX)
+ message(WARNING "\"LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX\" is deprecated. "
+ "Please set \"CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR\" directly instead.")
+ set(CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR "lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX}")
----------------
sebastian-ne wrote:
> There’s also `message(DEPRECATION …)` :)
Oh nice!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130586/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130586
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
