aprantl added a comment.

> Well that was my confusion, no there isn't an option. So how does one end up 
> with a build that doesn't include it. Perhaps a standalone build of lldb, 
> built with a prebuilt llvm that didn't package libLTO?

This is just about adding a dependency between lldb-test-deps and libLTO. If 
you just run `ninja check-lldb` prior to this patch libLTO would not be built. 
Now it is. This is not about a build setting, just about a build dependency. 
Without this dependency why would we expect libLTO get built?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D140051/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D140051

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to