aprantl added a comment. > Well that was my confusion, no there isn't an option. So how does one end up > with a build that doesn't include it. Perhaps a standalone build of lldb, > built with a prebuilt llvm that didn't package libLTO?
This is just about adding a dependency between lldb-test-deps and libLTO. If you just run `ninja check-lldb` prior to this patch libLTO would not be built. Now it is. This is not about a build setting, just about a build dependency. Without this dependency why would we expect libLTO get built? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140051/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140051 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits