aprantl added a comment. In D142683#4086026 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D142683#4086026>, @aprantl wrote:
> It shouldn't be able to interfere with the declarations in the (missing) .dwo > file in that case, right? Maybe I should have bothered reading your comment in the code. That's exactly the case you were trying to avoid m-( CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142683/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142683 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
