mib added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/bindings/interface/SBAddressDocstrings.i:1-2
+%feature("docstring",
+"A section + offset based address class.
+
----------------
kastiglione wrote:
> How much of these header docs are specific to the API, but not specific to
> Swig bindings? Should/can we move these to the SB headers and have Swig make
> use of those? In other words, can/should files like `SBAddressDocstrings.I`
> contain only docs that are specific to bindings?
IIUC, @bulbazord feel free to correct me on this, most doc will be generate
from doxygen in the header file and only things that are specific to the
bindings will be in the interface.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142926/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142926
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
