kpdev42 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp:1483
+ // base with all fields having [[no_unique_address]] attribute.
+ for (auto it = base_classes.rbegin(); it != base_classes.rend(); ++it) {
+ clang::CXXRecordDecl *prev_base_decl =
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
> Michael137 wrote:
> > The main problem I still see with this is that if we have something like:
> > ```
> > struct A : C, B {
> >
> > };
> > ```
> >
> > then we mark `C`'s fields as empty and leave `B` as is. This still leads to
> > the same crash later on.
> >
> > Perhaps we should mark we could check the size of the struct and decide
> > based on that which one is the "empty" one
> Interestingly there was a discussion on the DWARF mailing list about this
> some time ago:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org/msg00880.html
>
> There might be room to changing the emitted DWARF to make it easier to
> determine the empty structure. I will gauge opinions on this thread later
> today
Unfortunately we cannot analyze record size, because it is always 1 for empty
records, whether or not [[no_unique_address]] is used. However we still can
analyze field offsets, I think. This what an updated patch does and it seems to
handle more different cases
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D143347/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D143347
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
