bulbazord added a comment. In D150303#4333215 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150303#4333215>, @rriddle wrote:
> Could we switch the RTTI to use the llvm RTTI extension mechanism, instead of > enums? Other classes have started doing this, and it'd be really nice if > users can write REPLS without needing to touch upstream LLDB. +1, LLVM's RTTI mechanism would make it easier to add new things without needing to change base classes. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150303/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150303 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
