bulbazord added a comment. In D150418#4337243 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150418#4337243>, @JDevlieghere wrote:
> Given the numbers I'm surprised you decided to stick with 8 rather than 4? > Unless I'm reading them wrong, it seems that despite the number of > allocations, it's about as fast and uses (a bit) less memory. Besides that > this LGTM. Yeah, I just forgot to update this before I published. Will update the patch before landing. Thanks for the review! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150418/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150418 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
