bulbazord requested review of this revision. bulbazord added a comment. So, I agree that we should definitely unify this or else we end up doing this for **every** scripting language that we add support for. That being said, I think this is actually better than what we had before because now we're not exposing lldb private details in the public interface. There is a TODO comment in `SWIGPythonBridge.h` already for cleaning this up when we have a moment... I don't want to block this patch unless we're ok reverting the previous one, and I'd preferably not revert that one...
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150624/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150624 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
