fdeazeve added a comment. In D158023#4590502 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158023#4590502>, @bulbazord wrote:
> I think the categories you've set are the same ones I would have created. May > I suggest renaming `Extending LLDB` to `Scripting LLDB` or something similar? > I think "Extending" and "Developing" are close enough in meaning that it may > be confusing to end users. +1 to scripting; this is the word we use all the time, so it makes sense to highlight it as the name of a category. Btw, what do you think of the extensions page? This patch currently keeps "extensions" under "using lldb", but if we read that page it contains no "using" information. It explains at length how an extension is *implemented* in terms of DWARF. Because of that, I think this page is aimed at developers. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D158023/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D158023 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
