bulbazord added a comment.

In D158833#4626023 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158833#4626023>, @mib wrote:

> In D158833#4625775 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158833#4625775>, @bulbazord 
> wrote:
>
>> Re-organizing the paths seems okay to me, especially since this is going to 
>> grow further. I think the header guards are going to need some adjustment 
>> though.
>
> TBH, I didn't even know they were guidelines wrt header guards 😅
>
> For long file names, I've been using this pattern in the past of separating 
> the words by `_` in the header guards, which also makes it more readable.
>
> I don't think that causes any harm but if you feel strongly about it I can 
> change it.

I don't think it's a huge deal personally. If you look hard enough, LLDB (and 
probably LLVM) are full of tiny mistakes in the header guard from moving files 
around.

For reference, the LLVM coding standards talks about it here: 
https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#header-guard


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D158833/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D158833

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to