bulbazord wrote:
> > ```
> > SBWatchpoint SBTarget::WatchpointCreateByAddress(addr_t address, size_t
> > size, uint32_t access_flags, SBError &error);
> > ```
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > with `eWatchpointAccess{Read,Write,Modify}` flags defined.
>
> @bulbazord what do you think about this suggestion? Would you still prefer an
> Options class?
I'm alright with an Options class. What I would like to see is flexibility
instead of adding new overloads every time we may want to add new levers and
knobs to change Watchpoint behavior.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66308
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
