================
@@ -696,3 +696,55 @@ template <> bool SetNumberFromPyObject<double>(double
&number, PyObject *obj) {
$1 = $input == Py_None;
$1 = $1 || PyCallable_Check(reinterpret_cast<PyObject *>($input));
}
+
+// For lldb::SBModuleLocateDwoCallback
+// The `baton` is the actual Python function passed, and we invoke the `baton`
via a SWIG function.
+%typemap(in) (lldb::SBModuleLocateDwoCallback callback,
+ void *baton) {
+ if (!($input == Py_None ||
+ PyCallable_Check(reinterpret_cast<PyObject *>($input)))) {
+ PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError, "Need a callable object or None!");
+ SWIG_fail;
+ }
+
+ if ($input == Py_None) {
+ $1 = nullptr;
+ $2 = nullptr;
+ } else {
+ PythonCallable callable = Retain<PythonCallable>($input);
+ if (!callable.IsValid()) {
+ PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError, "Need a valid callable object");
+ SWIG_fail;
+ }
+
+ llvm::Expected<PythonCallable::ArgInfo> arg_info = callable.GetArgInfo();
+ if (!arg_info) {
+ PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError,
+ ("Could not get arguments: " +
+ llvm::toString(arg_info.takeError())).c_str());
----------------
bulbazord wrote:
The way you're building this string is a little difficult to parse because I
originally thought the `.c_str()` was attached to the `std::string` returned by
`llvm::toString`. I would suggest making it more explicit by building the
string ahead of time instead of doing it inline.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69517
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
