================
@@ -831,6 +831,37 @@ bool
lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallCommandObject(
return true;
}
+bool lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallParsedCommandObject(
+ PyObject *implementor, lldb::DebuggerSP debugger,
lldb_private::StructuredDataImpl &args_impl,
+ lldb_private::CommandReturnObject &cmd_retobj,
+ lldb::ExecutionContextRefSP exe_ctx_ref_sp) {
+
+ PyErr_Cleaner py_err_cleaner(true);
+
+ PythonObject self(PyRefType::Borrowed, implementor);
+ auto pfunc = self.ResolveName<PythonCallable>("__call__");
+
+ if (!pfunc.IsAllocated())
+ return false;
----------------
bulbazord wrote:
Can we update the `CommandReturnObject` with useful feedback about what failed?
The bool return value is super opaque.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70734
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
