adrian-prantl wrote:

> > doesn't appear to be anything that calls these methods
> 
> Candidate for removal then? If so it still makes sense to fix them, then 
> remove them. Saves fixing them again if they are brought back.
> 
> Either way, I'm not going to block this by requiring a test case.

I think that makes sense. @PortalPete why don't you land this without a test 
and then create a PR to remove the unused methods?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74413
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to