================ @@ -9108,7 +9123,8 @@ bool Sema::CheckExplicitlyDefaultedComparison(Scope *S, FunctionDecl *FD, // declaration, it is implicitly considered to be constexpr. // FIXME: Only applying this to the first declaration seems problematic, as // simple reorderings can affect the meaning of the program. - if (First && !FD->isConstexpr() && Info.Constexpr) + if ((First && !FD->isConstexpr() && Info.Constexpr) || + getLangOpts().CPlusPlus23) ---------------- cor3ntin wrote:
> isn't Info.Constexpr always true in c++ mode? **C++23**, sorry > Should the call to such function be allowed? I suppose not due to-literal > member. The problem is, there result is same with or without this change. I > meant to apply this Hum right, i was thinking we could have a `if(false)` in the comparison function, but that's for defaulted function so it doesn't work. The error message should be different though, right? something like "the call to operator== is not a constant expression" ? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77753 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
