RamaMalladiAWS wrote: > OK. We would not usually add intrinsics like this without a strong motivating > case, that could not be optimized in some other way. It is better to use > target independent options when available, and inline assembly is available > as a fallback if it is really needed. But I would recommend that they use > normal and/or/shift operations and let us know about places the compiler > isn't optimizing them as well as it could be.
I completely agree with the approach @davemgreen. In this case, the IR sequence wasn't optimized to a `bfi`. I can try to get a test-case and create an issue for better sequence if feasible. Thanks again. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79672 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
