================
@@ -218,6 +219,106 @@ void DebugNamesDWARFIndex::GetCompleteObjCClass(
   m_fallback.GetCompleteObjCClass(class_name, must_be_implementation, 
callback);
 }
 
+namespace {
+using Entry = llvm::DWARFDebugNames::Entry;
+
+/// If `entry` and all of its parents have an `IDX_parent`, use that 
information
+/// to build and return a list of at most `max_parents` parent Entries.
+/// `entry` itself is not included in the list.
+/// If any parent does not have an `IDX_parent`, or the Entry data is 
corrupted,
+/// nullopt is returned.
+std::optional<llvm::SmallVector<Entry, 4>>
+getParentChain(Entry entry, uint32_t max_parents) {
+  llvm::SmallVector<Entry, 4> parent_entries;
+
+  do {
+    if (!entry.hasParentInformation())
+      return std::nullopt;
+
+    llvm::Expected<std::optional<Entry>> parent = entry.getParentDIEEntry();
+    if (!parent) {
+      // Bad data.
+      consumeError(parent.takeError());
----------------
adrian-prantl wrote:

Should/could we LLDB_LOG this to the dwarf channel here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79932
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to