https://github.com/felipepiovezan approved this pull request.
This LGTM! I don't think I can see far enough ahead on what you are planning here, but I was just wondering if the ultimate goal is to have the `option_arg.getAsT` return an `Expected<T>`. In this case, wouldn't all these arguments (short option, long option, additional context) have to be part of the interface of `getAsT`? I suspect this is not your goal, but I can't see a way around that https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82273 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
