================
@@ -227,7 +265,7 @@ class ThreadPool {
class ThreadPoolTaskGroup {
----------------
aganea wrote:
Wouldn't the implemention for `ThreadPoolTaskGroup` come in hand with the one
for `ThreadPool`? I feel if someone implements the `ThreadPoolInterface` they
would want something similar for the groups? The use case is like I said: the
new implementation would want to store something in the `ThreadPoolTaskGroup`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82094
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
